Jump to content

Welcome to Airsoft Forums UK
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Are there exceptions to the law?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1
kaiser

kaiser

    AF-UK Starter

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
I was into airsoft about 15 years ago, back when there was no real law about owning an all black replica gun. When I looked into it again recently and discovered the change in the law I thought it was a good sensible idea. What I do not understand is there seems to be almost no exceptions to the law. For example, I am a fully licensed shotgun owner, I shoot on a regular basis (both clays and game), how is it that I am not trusted to buy a replica firearm when I have been through the slightly more rigorous licensing process (including two police visits and a gun safe inspection) to get my shotgun certificate. It seems odd to me that I am able to own a real firearm but not a replica airsoft one.

I have no issues with going through the process to obtain a UKARA registration but it seems to me to be overkill, I absolutely agree with need for a licensing process when it comes to airsoft but why no exceptions?

I am not bringing this up for an argument or anything like I was just wondering whether anyone had any thoughts on the matter.

Kai

#2
RR01

RR01

    AF-UK Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 711 posts

  • Guns: TM Glock 17 GBB
    Dan Wesson 2.5in Revolver

  • Loadouts: Multicam BDU

  • Sites: None, now retired from playing

I was into airsoft about 15 years ago, back when there was no real law about owning an all black replica gun. When I looked into it again recently and discovered the change in the law I thought it was a good sensible idea. What I do not understand is there seems to be almost no exceptions to the law. For example, I am a fully licensed shotgun owner, I shoot on a regular basis (both clays and game), how is it that I am not trusted to buy a replica firearm when I have been through the slightly more rigorous licensing process (including two police visits and a gun safe inspection) to get my shotgun certificate. It seems odd to me that I am able to own a real firearm but not a replica airsoft one.

I have no issues with going through the process to obtain a UKARA registration but it seems to me to be overkill, I absolutely agree with need for a licensing process when it comes to airsoft but why no exceptions?

I am not bringing this up for an argument or anything like I was just wondering whether anyone had any thoughts on the matter.

Kai


The VCRA was a knee-jerk reaction by politicians to a problem that didn't really exist (not unusual). We're lucky that hard work by the retailers, site owners, etc. at least got us the specific defence to allow us to continue to own RIFs and play airsoft, but as part of that work there were only limited exemptions. The fact that FAC holders were not included in that list was because they, like collectors, didn't have a need for them, whereas we do. That said, how many owners of RIFs have gone on a killing rampage in the last 10-20 years, compared to how many licenced gun owners?? <_<

#3
TPI

TPI

    AF-UK Addict

  • Supporters
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2428 posts

  • Loadouts: GroundBreaker

  • Sites: Highland Tactical Airsoft
I don`t how many have?........................(wait`s expecting a funny end to the joke).......................... i can tell you though it`s most likely becuase of people who have the license to have a gun turn their nose`s up at airsoft they certainly do in america apart from a few (Thank you NutnFancy)

I'm Craig, God's Boss!
FeedBack

#4
kaiser

kaiser

    AF-UK Starter

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

I don`t how many have?........................(wait`s expecting a funny end to the joke).......................... i can tell you though it`s most likely becuase of people who have the license to have a gun turn their nose`s up at airsoft they certainly do in america apart from a few (Thank you NutnFancy)


That is probably true but that is beside the point, why should I go through another process in order to get a replica gun when I have already been checked and probed by the police for my SGC? It seems odd to me.

Rest assured I do not turn my nose up at airsofters although I cannot see me getting into it myself.

#5
Finius

Finius

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1625 posts
Because a replica is much harder to trace forensically, for a list of reasons longer than my "little (leviathan sized) man"**. The options when compiling the VCRA were simple. Put airsoft under the firearms licensing system, thus making them equal in terms of security requirements, declarations of purchase, punishment for misuse etc (and therefore making them seem more threatening and less like toys as well as a myriad of other things), or give them a specific defence for certain uses under the VCRA and clarify their place in British law.

I will always gun for alternatives to UKARA - it's a silly system, you wouldn't believe how hard I argued with people overt the Two Tone situation too, but, we got the deal we got and frankly, it's better than what we were told at first so I'll take it and I'll live with it.

**Yes, that was a penis joke :D

#6
Johnno

Johnno

    AF-UK Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 234 posts

  • Guns: 3 x G & G M4 (inc 1 Blowback)
    TM MP5A3
    2 xCyma Glock
    M203 stand alone GL
    M700 Sniper

  • Loadouts: Any old Shite I have lying around but mainly a set of M65 and a Vest.

It seems odd to me that I am able to own a real firearm but not a replica airsoft one.

I have no issues with going through the process to obtain a UKARA registration but it seems to me to be overkill, I absolutely agree with need for a licensing process when it comes to airsoft but why no exceptions?

I am not bringing this up for an argument or anything like I was just wondering whether anyone had any thoughts on the matter.

Kai


There is no problem owning a RIF without UKARA if you have had it since before the regs came in as far as I know. The problems start when you try to buy a new one :(
Need to stop spending Money on Toy Guns and stuff :-( DREAM ON !




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users