Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Posted 22 January 2012 - 11:26 PM
It's purely the fact I often bump in to people who come out with the same old tired "oh ma gawd... Multicams duz like, so not workz in t3h w00dz u n00b" and I get a bit bored of trying to reason with them.
Posted 22 January 2012 - 11:43 PM
I've had similar debates about pretty much every single aspect of modern weaponry and tac gear at some point, but as they say: "haters gonna hate". I don't know what it is, there just seems to be some sort of imaginary implied 'coolness' about you if you buck the trend and slam on guys who happen to be using stuff that works when said stuff and also happens to be popular with a lot of other folks because... well.. it works (whatever 'it' is). Crazy how you tend to see lots of people using stuff that works... some sort of crazy logic going on there that's for sure...
Posted 22 January 2012 - 11:54 PM
some sort of crazy logic going on there that's for sure...
Like M4 haters as everyone has them, but as a platform they work. (Says guy trying to replace his M4 with a G3 for almost that reason along with love of H&K).
I think your comment haters will be haters sums it up though. Heard some very personal comments being made about a really nice guy at one of my games for wearing 'desert' in woodland. Yes his camo didnt work that great being too light, but I was in black and that didnt work either that well. At ranges we were working at camo was not really the issue anyway. Seems some people just like to run other people down.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 07:53 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:18 PM
here you can see my permanent loadout:
Left side (right on picture) 6 M4 pouches, changed to either more pistol pouches or a small utility, weapon dependant (here you can see that UMP mags do fit M4 pouches..... just)
right side is 2 pistol mags, pistol, suppressor holster and then at the back in the middle is my dump pouch (scroll through the album/http://www.facebook....3...6187&type=3)
Send the doctors home, I'll be doing the operating around here.
Resident Patrol Base Techy, any questions about PB, message me and I'll do my best to answer.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 10:11 PM
here you can see my permanent loadout
I could see it, looking good.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:20 PM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:32 AM
Your stance there isn't even anything remotely like the ones demonstrated in the Magpul DVDs, which makes his comment doubly ridiculous.
Posted 28 January 2012 - 01:53 AM
- ATS Warbelt
- ATS Warbelt Insert
- 2 x OPS Pistol Mag Pouches
- TAG Roll-Up Dump Pouch
- G-Code RTI MOLLE Adapter
- Blackhawk 1911 SERPA w/ RTI Hanger
- VTAC 'Brokos' Battle Belt
- Warrior 2" Duty Belt
- 2 x HSGI Pistol TACOs
- Emdom-MM Dump Pouch
- G-Code RTI Kydex Belt Slide
- G-Code 1911 OSH w/ Multicam Finish & RTI Hanger
Posted 28 January 2012 - 12:26 PM
If you need a team or any patch deigns.. drop me a PM!!
Posted 28 January 2012 - 01:05 PM
Posted 28 January 2012 - 05:33 PM
My Kimber is insanely tight inside the OSH but I'm certain that's down to the HurricanE metal kit rather than the holster, because all my TMs are fine. SERPAs are fine, never had a problem with any of mine in all my time airsofting, but G-Code make a much wider range of holster types, all of which comes in a much wider variety of colours and styles. All works on tension fit as well, the holsters don't even need a locking mechanism. Not that I'm saying the SERPA lock is complicated, but in a pinch situation when you need your pistol ASAP then an extra fraction of a second never hurt anybody.
Posted 28 January 2012 - 05:45 PM
Posted 28 January 2012 - 07:34 PM
might have to have a look at getting one of the g codes then, they do look really nice
I'm gonna have to award myself 10 tard points
Posted 28 January 2012 - 07:46 PM
The GSH is their standard model, but I went for the OSH because it's that bit lower profile and only costs $4 extra. Though do be aware you'll have to pay a little bit more for a mount, unlike SERPAs these don't come with belt mounts as standard. Worth it to mind.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users